MX 10 mta0 MX 10 mta1 MX 10 mta1but this doesn't work. BIND just ignores the second entry as redundant. I could make mta2 a CNAME for mta1 and then add mta2 as a third MX record. I've done some tests in a test environment and this works. However, this is a hack and having CNAMES for MX records is not theoretically not permitted (RFC 1034 section 3.6.2).
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
DNS MX hacks
In a previous post I talked about mail gateway load balancing by having two MX records in BIND. I mentioned that I'd want the more powerful server chosen a larger percentage of the time.
You would think I could just add another instance of the same host:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment